hi Two of the demographics archetypes are open for review : postal address and person name. I appear to be the only one who has commented on either, but the system seems to have lost my review of the person name archetype?
I have mainly focused on interoperability with ISO 21090 (healthcare datatypes, which include name and address). The archetypes are fairly faithful to ISO 22220, and need a few features added to become effectively interoperable with ISO 21090. Heather and I are working on this for a future release of 22220. In the meantime, the authors ask, what should the scope of these two archetypes be? just a minimal 22220? My response is, they should have a few more specific features added so that they are interoperable enough with 21090. Due to differences in approach, it's never going to be 100%, but it doesn't really need to be. We can get to 99% fairly cheaply, and that's what I've aimed at in my comments. I thought I'd raise it on the list here and get comment to help with the author's principle question. btw, to the authors: great job, thanks Grahame
