Thanks, Heath, I hadn't thought about that ADL can be used to another reference-model. It is also visible in the Java-test-files voor the ADL-parser, for convenience, fantasy reference models are used to test the ADL-parser. That it is common practice to point to locatable-representations in use-node does not make it to a rule.
regards, Bert Op 30-08-10 03:42, Heath Frankel schreef: > Hi Bert, > ADL is independent of a particular reference model, therefore there is no > requirement for a use_node to reference a LOCATABLE as it is an RM specific > class. However, the use_node path would need to be a valid unique archetype > path within the archetype. > > Regards > > Heath > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org [mailto:openehr-technical- >> bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Bert Verhees >> Sent: Saturday, 28 August 2010 12:29 AM >> To: For openEHR technical discussions >> Subject: use_node >> >> Please allow me a small question, I think, just for formality reasons. >> >> Is a archetypeInternalRef always pointing to a node representing a >> Locatable? >> >> I haven't seen other way, but it is not explicitly mentioned in the ADL >> 1.4 specs >> >> Thanks >> Bert >> _______________________________________________ >> openEHR-technical mailing list >> openEHR-technical at openehr.org >> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical >> > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical > >
