Hi Otavio, Thanks for the input. There are a few of us looking at the wound archetypes via Google Wave at
https://wave.google.com/wave/#restored:wave:googlewave.com!w%252BsliTddCQD Your contribution would be very welcome. If you need a Google Wave invitation, just let me know. Ian Dr Ian McNicoll office / fax +44(0)141 560 4657 mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 skype ianmcnicoll ian.mcnicoll at oceaninformatics.com ian at mcmi.co.uk Clinical Analyst Ocean Informatics openEHR Archetype Editorial Group Member BCS Primary Health Care SG Group www.phcsg.org / BCS Health Scotland On 4 February 2010 13:15, Otavio Silva <otavio_uff104 at yahoo.com.br> wrote: > Dear all, > I would like to ask you to consider the inclusion in the "type of wound" > of "animal agression". > Because this kind of wound has proper features that should be > differentiated of all the rest and so incluiding would avoid of making > another archetype almost identical to > openEHR-EHR-CLUSTER.inspection-skin-wound.v1 just to consider those wounds > made by animals... > Thanks in advance, > Otavio > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > openEHR-clinical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100204/c72fb0aa/attachment.html>
