In general questions like this can be answered by looking at any of:
* the relevant specifications:
http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.2/roadmap.html , in this case,
http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.2/architecture/rm/ehr_im.pdf
* the online UML - root link:
http://www.openehr.org/svn/specification/TAGS/Release-1.0.1/publishing/architecture/computable/UML/uml_start_view.html
; in this case,
http://www.openehr.org/uml/release-1.0.1/Browsable/_9_0_76d0249_1109249648736_872559_12384Report.html
* the ADL Workbench schema, at
http://www.openehr.org/svn/ref_impl_eiffel/BRANCHES/specialisation/apps/adl_workbench/app/rm_schemas/openehr_rm_102.dadl
- thomas beale
On 16/07/2010 10:47, Leonardo Moretti wrote:
> Hi Alessandro,
> items cardinality matches {0..*; unordered} is referred to "items" elements,
> not to "protocol" element
>
> This means we can have something like this:
> <observation>
> <data>
> ...
> </data>
> <protocol archetype_node_id="at0011" xsi:type="ITEM_TREE">
> <name>
> <value>*List(en)</value>
> </name>
> </protocol>
> <observation>
>
> Is the section
> <protocol archetype_node_id="at0011" xsi:type="ITEM_TREE">
> <name>
> <value>*List(en)</value>
> </name>
> </protocol>
> mandatory, even if it doesn't have any items?
> Looking at the archetype defintion, so it seems!
>
> leo
>
>
> Alessandro Torrisi-3 wrote:
>
>> Leo,
>>
>> as far as i can see the protocol section is not mandatory :
>>
>> protocol matches {
>> ITEM_TREE[at0011] matches { -- lijst structuur
>> items cardinality matches {0..*; unordered} matches {
>>
>> as you can see 0..* (means zero times until unbounded times), so not
>> mandatory
>>
>> Alessandro
>>
>>
>> On 15 July 2010 17:57, Moretti Leonardo<lmoretti at noemalife.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> I have a doubt in interpretating the archetype definition when there are
>>> "state" or "protocol" structure. For example, looking at "Blood
>>> Pressure" in http://openehr.org/knowledge/, I'm wondering if "protocol"
>>> structure is mandatory, as it seems looking at the archetype. If I don't
>>> know any details about the protocol, do I have to insert an empty tag
>>> <protocol> however?
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> leo
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>>> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
>>> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alessandro Torrisi
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
>> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Ocean Informatics *Thomas Beale
Chief Technology Officer, Ocean Informatics
<http://www.oceaninformatics.com/>*
Chair Architectural Review Board, /open/EHR Foundation
<http://www.openehr.org/>
Honorary Research Fellow, University College London
<http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/>
Chartered IT Professional Fellow, BCS, British Computer Society
<http://www.bcs.org.uk/>
Health IT blog <http://www.wolandscat.net/>
*
*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100716/96744de7/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ocean_full_small.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5828 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100716/96744de7/attachment.jpg>
