Dear all, I have a doubt about templates defined as an archetype specialization. The updated specs say that templates are just a further specialized archetype. So, any change made at that level (remove or define mandatory nodes, slot filling, etc.) also means a new level at the node identifier. For example, if I have a node with "at0001" and I constraint something of it at the template level, we should generate a new "at0001.1" for that node.
The question is, data instances that will be generated should use the clinical archetype node id (at0001) or the template node id (at0001.1) as archetype identifier? Or phrased differently, for the second case, if I communicate the instance, should I also share the template definition to better describe it or would be enough by sharing only the clinical archetype? David -- David Moner Cano Grupo de Inform?tica Biom?dica - IBIME Instituto ITACA http://www.ibime.upv.es Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia (UPV) Camino de Vera, s/n, Edificio G-8, Acceso B, 3? planta Valencia ? 46022 (Espa?a) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101119/19f2a26c/attachment.html>
