And it's to simplistic too. In that case one also would like to know allergic to which specific type(s) and/or components of penicillin. In that case I also would like to know how that was tested, when and who did that etc., etc.
So I guess what's I'm trying to say is: What's the value of such forms and should we discuss this at this level? I guess that doctors always will keep using local forms for all sorts of purposes and at their own responsibility but I don't think we should try to standardize these form as well. I we're able to record the symptoms/abnormalities/functions found or exluded, by whom using which method it's up to the person who has access to that data how to interpret it and to evaluate if he/she can draw a conclusion based on his/ her standards. Like I said earlier an diagnose RA from hospital A can be a different disease from the one meant by the diagnose RA from hospital B and unless I have access to the underlying data I can't and won't use the the diagnose. Cheers, Stef Op 10 feb 2011, om 11:47 heeft Ricardo Correia het volgende geschreven: > Of course, this would for sure have bad implications regarding the size of > forms and time to fill them -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110210/de13344a/attachment.html>
