http://www.nih.gov/news/pr/oct2007/nhlbi-01.htm

http://challenge.gov/NIH/132-nlm-show-off-your-apps-innovative-uses-of-nlm-information

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/databases/



On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Athanassios I. Hatzis, PhD
<hatzis at healis.gr> wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been following the "Dual Model EHR implementation" discussion and it just
> occurred to me that all these approaches would make much more sense if they 
> have
> been accompanied by sample clinical data, databases open to the public.
> Scientifically speaking one has to test any method with data to judge
> efficiency, etc...
>
> Something which is also very true in most cases is that in most EHR systems a
> specific database modeling, implementation approach has been chosen due to
> limited resources, (time and money) and other specific conditions of the 
> problem
> domain and application field. Presumably there is a huge gap between 
> commercial
> systems and scientific/educational/open systems.
>
> It is also true that database modeling and other issues are part of the
> information management systems domain (including content management, ERP,
> knowledge management, information modeling, information retrieval etc...). I 
> am
> just trying to make the point that :
>
> If we are studying IMPLEMENTATION/DEVELOPMENT OF GLOBAL INFORMATION MODELS in
> e-health or more generally speaking trying to apply information science 
> theories
> in the medical field then we need A LOT OF DATA to test it. Data that are open
> to the public (e.g. open data foundation, open data commons) etc... As Tim
> Berners-Lee says it does not matter in what format, just put the data on the 
> web
> and people will find ways to work with it.
>
> In that respect there has to be global repository with clinical data of any
> form, (fictional demographics, clinical documents, admissions, procedures, 
> etc).
> Ideally there should be some correlation with anonymous patients at the 
> center.
>
> All this human effort of international groups like HL7 or openEHR make much 
> more
> sense if anonymous clinical data are open to the public. This is the only way 
> in
> my opinion to promote both information science and clinical research, to 
> promote
> the medical field.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Athanassios
> http://healis.eu
> http://medilig.org
>
>
> PS: Perhaps researchers in this field can point us to such open clinical data
> already available ????
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical
>



-- 
================
Timothy Cook, MSc
Project Lead - Multi-Level Healthcare Information Modeling
http://www.mlhim.org

LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook
Skype ID == timothy.cook
Academic.Edu Profile: http://uff.academia.edu/TimothyCook

You may get my Public GPG key from? popular keyservers or
from this link http://timothywayne.cook.googlepages.com/home


Reply via email to