Hi Tom, others

I now see all points. I really like the idea of specialised templates used for 
GUI hints (as well as for other usual purposes) and that we have the usual 
shared templates without any of this. I am happy to put our contributions and 
encourage others to do so. The thing is many of the design decision we made 
were influenced by our lead developer, Dr. Yang, who didn't really know much 
about openEHR in the beginning. But he ws able to relate many existing software 
engineering practices and theory to this world. I thing we need to engage more 
people who are are really objective in this space.

Cheers,

-koray

________________________________
From: openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org [openehr-technical-bounces at 
openehr.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Beale [[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, 26 March 2011 2:05 a.m.
To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
Subject: Re: GUI stuff in AOM/ADL? (Was: future ADL-versions)

On 25/03/2011 03:05, Koray Atalag wrote:
Hi Eric, good points...As you may remember we had this discussion on this list 
not so long ago and I don?t remember any action taken after that. I guess we 
should take lead and come up with some proposal. Perhaps it?d be good to have a 
wiki space  - but I want to repeat myself: someone from core group must guide 
the group and provide early feedback whether we are on the right track or not.

To all interested in this area: in terms of innovation and ideas, the people in 
this discussion are the 'core group'.  Advice from myself and others 
historically working on the specifications is as I have already posted, i.e. 
IMO, stick to the separation of concerns with respect to artefacts. I 
personally would not include GUI-related hints in templates either, because 
there will eventually emerge some templates that are widely shared, e.g. 
national and international (e.g. European) discharge summary, referral, 
e-prescription etc - but whose GUI models are very unlikely to be shared. On 
that view of things, you don't want to have to revise such a published resource 
due to some particular GUI directives buried inside it. This doesn't mean that 
the ADL (abstract or XML form) formalism can't be used, but I still think a 
separation of the pieces will make dependency and release management a lot 
easier. Erik may be right: if the GUI hints can be expressed in a template, 
then by definition, it can be done in a specialised template, and that can 
clearly be local.

At the moment, we have to consider this area as 'industrial research', and I 
for one would encourage all experimentation to be published and flagged on this 
list, as a way of getting us all on the same page with respect to lessons being 
learned.

- thomas beale

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110329/2966f07b/attachment.html>

Reply via email to