On 29/05/2011 22:50, Grahame Grieve wrote:
> it'd be either Orders and Observations or Modeling and Methodology.
>
> I don't think that your proposed solution is valid. It meets the
> syntactical requirements while making a mess of any semantic
> meaning.
>
well... ok, but {} in UCUM is for things whose syntax doesn't make
proper sense... if we can make sense of it in the non-{} part of UCUM,
how do is it done? Everything unit has to either fit into the regular
part of UCUM or else the {} 'escape hatch' doesn't it?
- thomas*
*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110530/d28eea2f/attachment.html>
