On 14/08/2012 21:42, pablo pazos wrote: > Hi Thomas, thanks for the answer. (now I see the problem of doublign > the number of node ids) > > I understood the Seref's problem as a case that could not be decided > automatically by a system, i.e. when to use and when not use the > nodeID to query and to get the desired node. > > Re-reading your response, I believe this should be part of the specs > as a rule: "...in this case, use the path > items[at0004]/value[at0022]...", i.e. when you have alternatives but, > in the data, one of them was choosen. > > What do you think? > * > *
Pablo, yes, I will add this in. thanks - thomas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120815/86e9eb5c/attachment.html>
