On 17-02-12 15:50, Randolph Neall wrote:
> >Other models I didn't try yet are Object Oriented DBs and Document 
> Oriented DBs (XML, JSON, ...) [6]. I think DODBs are a good option, 
> fast for store highly hierarchical structures, but you need to write 
> some ugly queries if you want your data back :D
> Aren't several major OpenEHR systems using XML or stored blobs on top 
> of a rather minimal DB schema?
> The problem with ORM systems would ultimately be a rather bloated 
> schema and hard-wired classes to accommodate that schema. Yes, ORM 
> lets you automate the creation of DB data structures and classes, but, 
> once created, they become part of the schema and your DLLs, which is 
> fine until you have many hundreds of them (tables and classes defined 
> in autogenerated code, etc.).

That is my experience too, that is why I prefer a simple schema, for 
example a key(path)/value schema. I heard about good experiences with 
storing XML-pathes and values.

The bad thing is, as Pablo said, you have to write software-logic to 
translate the paths/values to RM-instances and back, but the good thing 
is, you only need to do it once, because the kernel/RM specs are very 
stable.

Also you need to be prepared for AQL queries and templates which use 
paths to retrieve information.

regards
Bert

> Randy Neall
> Veriquant, L.L.C.
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:26 PM, pablo pazos <pazospablo at hotmail.com 
> <mailto:pazospablo at hotmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi M?rcio,
>
>     There is no standard persistence model, the persistence mechanism
>     is not in the standard scope.
>
>     There are many ways of storing openEHR RM instances (archetyped
>     data), the only thing to take into account is that the information
>     to store will be highly hierarchical.
>
>     Said that, in EHRGen [1] we use a relational model with an
>     Object-Relational Mapping [2] tool (GORM from Grails
>     Framework[3]). The advantage of that is that you have a complete
>     and validated RM instance persisted on the DB, and you can query
>     for complete objects or single data ELEMENTS. I've written ORM
>     tools myself [4] and the main problem is the amount of joins you
>     need to load a complete structure, but in my experience you never
>     load a complete structure for a real time interaction with the
>     user, and you alway can cach? some data.
>
>     This approach is straight forward, because all you need are the
>     classes of the RM, and you delegate DB stuff to the ORM tool.
>
>     Other models are viable too, like K/V [5] or EAV [6] approaches
>     (mentioned by Bert). This approaches are fast for saving and
>     loading data, the problem is that you need to have some complex
>     logic above that for constructing a complete RM instance on
>     memory, because K/V is a flat representation of a higly
>     hierarchical tree structure.
>
>     Other models I didn't try yet are Object Oriented DBs and Document
>     Oriented DBs (XML, JSON, ...) [6]. I think DODBs are a good
>     option, fast for store highly hierarchical structures, but you
>     need to write some ugly queries if you want your data back :D
>
>     Hope that helps.
>
>     [1] http://code.google.com/p/open-ehr-gen-framework/
>     [2] http://grails.org/
>     [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-relational_mapping
>     [4] http://code.google.com/p/yupp/
>     [5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NoSQL
>     [6]
>     http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entity%E2%80%93attribute%E2%80%93value_model
>
>
>     -- 
>     Kind regards,
>     Ing. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez
>     LinkedIn: http://uy.linkedin.com/in/pablopazosgutierrez
>     Blog: http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/
>     Twitter: http://twitter.com/ppazos
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     From: mdckoury at gmail.com <mailto:mdckoury at gmail.com>
>     Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:53:19 -0300
>     Subject: openEHR - Persistence of Data
>     To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
>     <mailto:openehr-technical at openehr.org>
>
>
>     Hello guys,
>
>     i'm starting a research about the persistence model of Archetype
>     data, that stores the information entered by the user of the system.
>
>     I would like to know if there is a indication of the openEHR
>     standard for what kind of model schema should be used in DataBase,
>     and if there are researchs in this area.
>
>     Thanks in advance,
>
>     *M?rcio Costa*
>     B.Sc. in Computer Science @ Cin/UFPE
>     M.Sc. Candidate in Computer Science @ CIn/UFPE
>     MSN: mdckoury at gmail.com <mailto:mdckoury at gmail.com>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical
>     mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org
>     <mailto:openEHR-technical at openehr.org>
>     http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     openEHR-technical mailing list
>     openEHR-technical at openehr.org <mailto:openEHR-technical at openehr.org>
>     http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120217/9009309a/attachment.html>

Reply via email to