Hi Bert, I can see instruction_details in the UML report - it is under Attributes from Associations and does indeed contain the references back to the original instruction/ Activity.
Ian Dr Ian McNicoll office +44 (0)1536 414 994 fax +44 (0)1536 516317 mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 skype ianmcnicoll ian.mcnicoll at oceaninformatics.com Clinical Modelling Consultant,?Ocean Informatics, UK Director/Clinical Knowledge Editor openEHR Foundation ?www.openehr.org/knowledge Honorary Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL SCIMP Working Group, NHS Scotland BCS Primary Health Care ?www.phcsg.org On 29 January 2012 17:50, Bert Verhees <bert.verhees at rosa.nl> wrote: > Maybe there is an inconsistentie between the specs in the PDF's and the > specs in the UML. > > Please take a look here: > http://www.openehr.org/uml/release-1.0.1/Browsable/_9_5_1_76d0249_1140195698328_962539_2370Report.html > > Missing is the attribute instruction_details which is mentioned in the > document: > http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.2/architecture/rm/ehr_im.pdf > (page 73) > > I have seen that the UML-link has the wrong Release-ID (1.0.1 instead of > 1.0.2), but this where I come when I click my way through the web > > Is it possible that this inconsistency confuses me? Or does it have > nothing to do with my previous question? > > Thanks for any comment on this > Bert Verhees > > On 29-01-12 15:11, Bert Verhees wrote: >> Sorry to ask a simple question. >> >> In which way is an Action connected to an Activity (in technical >> design). I don't understand which attributes are used, or how it is done? >> >> Thanks for any short answer. >> >> Bert >> _______________________________________________ >> openEHR-technical mailing list >> openEHR-technical at openehr.org >> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical >> > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
