Hi all, GitHub is very good site to incubate source codes. Anyone can fork source codes, commit and merge them. As Ian mentioned, I have thought GitHub could be a incubation repository for archetypes, which were premature than CKM repository. However, license issue must be fixed to do, at first. Apache 2.0 license is very good.
Best regards, Shinji 2012/3/2 Ian McNicoll <Ian.McNicoll at oceaninformatics.com>: > Excellent. I was just thinking yesterday that as well as regularly > outputting CKM to a Git repository, we also ought to bring together > other legacy material e.g the NHS and any other artefacts people want > to share e.g some of the vendor-developed archetypes that I have been > working on but which are very suitable for wider use. > > We will need to clearly differentiate repositories which are inert, > from those which are active but uncontrolled, and those which are > tightly governed - the latter will not really exist until we have > proper namespacing established. > > As far as the openEHR CKM repository is concerned, given current > development schedules, an automated update to Github is unlikely to > appear any time soon but I will commit to doing so manually on a > regular basis or when any significant changes occur e.g new uploads or > publications. > > Ian > > > > On 1 March 2012 16:19, Thomas Beale <thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com> > wrote: >> >> yep, it's me, I forgot to set anything up. For the moment I am sole member >> and admin. We might need a little bit of planning about how to use the >> openEHR space I think - I am just thinking of how to make sure we have a >> fairly comprehensible (to outsiders) Github presence, while of course >> allowing open use. >> >> Once the software group gets a plan together, let me know and I will add >> some other admins etc. >> >> - thomas >> >> >> On 01/03/2012 15:45, Erik Sundvall wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> I found that somebody had registered openEHR as organisation name on >> Github, good! >> https://github.com/openEHR >> >> Now I just wonder who is the admin since the site does not say it. >> >> I know that I hinted to Tom a long time ago that it would be worth >> getting the org name reserved there, are you the admin Tom? >> >> Perhaps we could try to get several openEHR projects connected to the >> organisation account (after some discussion first of course). >> >> Best regards, >> Erik Sundvall >> erik.sundvall at liu.se http://www.imt.liu.se/~erisu/? Tel: +46-13-286733 >> >> P.s. Software interested tech-list subscribers, make sure you are also >> subscribed to... >> openehr-implementers at lists.openehr.org >> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-implementers_lists.openehr.org >> ...since that is where the "software program" of openEHR is going to >> host discussion according to board decisions. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openEHR-technical mailing list >> openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org >> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openEHR-technical mailing list >> openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org >> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org > > > > -- > Dr Ian McNicoll > office +44 (0)1536 414 994 > fax +44 (0)1536 516317 > mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 > skype ianmcnicoll > ian.mcnicoll at oceaninformatics.com > > Clinical Modelling Consultant,?Ocean Informatics, UK > Director/Clinical Knowledge Editor openEHR Foundation > ?www.openehr.org/knowledge > Honorary Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL > SCIMP Working Group, NHS Scotland > BCS Primary Health Care ?www.phcsg.org > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
