> This is a good idea.Unfortunately we only store members names and > email addresses as part of the list. In many cases the email address > is unhelpful in determining the location of the member. There are > currently 428 members on the clinical list. So far we have resisted > the idea of a more formal membership list with other member details > but perhaps this is something that should be reconsidered.
Certainly don't make it mandatory. Karsten
