Don't get too excited about the XMI just yet - I have done some more 
work on the models, including adding demographics and EHR Extract parts, 
and will replace the XMI soon.

- thomas

On 26/03/2012 10:18, Rong Chen wrote:
> Thanks, very useful resources indeed!
> /Rong
>
> On 21 March 2012 10:49, Thomas Beale<thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com>  
> wrote:
>> On 21/03/2012 09:41, Thomas Beale wrote:
>>
>>
>> I have put up some more up-to-date UML resources for the current (1.0.2)
>> release of openEHR on this wiki page. For the moment I have done two
>> diagrams (RM and Data types) which should help people a) understand openEHR
>> at a glance and b) understand what classes matter for archetyping.
>>
>> Two generated XMI files are available - UML 2.1 (for Eclipse) and UML 2.3
>> (for RSA and other tools); as far as I can ascertain, they don't contain
>> diagrams, but do faithfully represent the model semantics. If people want to
>> actually share diagrams, at the moment it appears to require using the same
>> tool (BOUML).
>>
>> I have not spent much time on this, and others are welcome (encouraged;-) to
>> jump in and add to the resources.
>>
>> - thomas
>>
>>
>> And I completely forgot to mention - thanks to Eric Browne who did the vast
>> majority of the model definition work.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>> openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org
>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
>
*
*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120326/4d89b602/attachment.html>

Reply via email to