If you have the following dv_ordinal
value existence matches {1..1} matches {
1|[local::at0044],
2|[local::at0045],
3|[local::at0046]
}
}
and you transform it to a standard representation you get something like this:
...
DV_ORDINAL occurrences matches {0..1} matches { --
symbol existence matches
{1..1} matches {
DV_CODED_TEXT occurrences
matches {0..1} matches { --
defining_code
existence matches {1..1} matches {
CODE_PHRASE
occurrences matches {0..1} matches { --
terminology_id
existence matches {1..1} matches {
TERMINOLOGY_ID occurrences matches {0..1} matches { --
value
existence matches {1..1} matches {"local"}
}
}
code_string
existence matches {1..1} matches {"at0050"}
}
}
}
}
value existence matches {1..1}
matches {1}
...
Taking into account that DV_CODED_TEXT 'value' attribute is
obligatory, what should be put on that when generating the standard
representation of an ordinal?
Specifications say: "For DV_CODED_TEXT, this is the rubric of the
complete term as provided by the terminology service", but as
terminology is local so I don't really know if it applies at all in
this case
Regards
