Bert, yes, you are right. It's not required, and the ADL Workbench and Ocean Template Designer don't care about the file name. It's a straightforward matter for all tools to remove this restriction (it means running a micro-parser across all the files to read the first line or few lines, so that an explorer / browser widget can be populated).
- thomas On 24/06/2012 13:30, Bert Verhees wrote: > Please consider following. > > I think it is a weak point to have a file which contains an archetype > having the same name as the archetype-id. > This policy is enforced by as well the OCEAN-editor as the LinkEHR > editor (however the latter has a bug in this). > > I don't know if it is "officially" specified. But the disadvantage is > that information is stored twice in the same file (in the contents and > in the filename), this can cause problems, ambiguities. > > Also, it is unnecessary restrictive, it is impossible to store more > archetypes in one text-file. > > Many programming languages have the same restriction, but often the > have also workarounds for this restriction. > > regards > Bert Verhees * > * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120624/3e1bdc4a/attachment.html>
