Hi Bert,
Personally I would use:
/items[at0008]/value[1]/value = Jan
/items[at0008]/value[2]/value = Peter
/items[at0009]/value/value = Balkenende
Regards
2013/11/19 Bert Verhees <bert.verhees at rosa.nl>:
> Hi all,
>
> I had following interesting discussion.
>
> Suppose we have a cluster containing name of a person.
>
> There is a field called firstname, and a field called lastname.
>
> The problem is concerning the ADL-path, what should be used.
>
> This is a part of the archetype:
>
> CLUSTER[at0007] occurrences matches {0..1} matches { -- voornamen
> items cardinality matches {0..*; ordered} matches {
> ELEMENT[at0008] occurrences matches {0..*}
> matches { -- firstname
> value matches {
> DV_TEXT matches {*}
> }
> }
> ELEMENT[at0009] occurrences matches {0..1}
> matches { -- lastname
> value matches {
> DV_TEXT matches {*}
> }
> }
> }
>
>
> This is a hypothecical example, only to explain:
>
> Because at0008 has upper-occurrences of more then 1 ( a person can have more
> then one firstnames)
> And at0009 has upper-occurrences of 1 (people only have one last-name (in
> this hypothetical country))
>
> If we want to express data in a path/value combination, what would be the
> best solution?
>
> /items[at0008][1]/value/value = Jan
> /items[at0008][2]/value/value = Peter
> /items[at0009]/value/value = Balkenende
>
> /items[at0008][1]/value/value = Jan
> /items[at0008][2]/value/value = Peter
> /items[at0009][1]/value/value = Balkenende
>
> /items[at0008][1]/value/value = Jan
> /items[at0008][2]/value/value = Peter
> /items[at0009][3]/value/value = Balkenende
>
> Or would another solution be better?
> Thanks in advance for suggestions.
>
> Kind regards
> Bert Verhees
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
