happy new year and best wishes for 2014. I hope your new year's day is a
bright one (unless you live in the UK, in which case it's a lost cause
today ;-)
I have been working in the last few months to produce a final version of
ADL/AOM 1.5, based on:
* existing requirements
<http://www.openehr.org/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=196633>,
* emerging requirements - Intermountain, CIMI,
* Harold Solbrig's proposals for terms-as-URIs,
* Dave Carlson's MDHT
<https://www.projects.openhealthtools.org/sf/projects/mdht/>/ AML
work at OMG <http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?health/2012-7-1>led by
Robert lario,
* general feedback on this list, particularly from David Moner's group
at UPV, where they have implemented different rules
* implementer feedback
I have cc:d some relevant people who are not on this list - they might
want to consider joining
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org>.
If not, please email me and I'll post any views you have on the list, or
else feel free to feedback on the wiki page below.
So here's the proposal. To date, We have been trying to keep ADL/AOM 1.5
backwardly compatible at the syntax level for ADL 1.4. However, I think
this keeps too many old problems unsolved. I propose a new approach:
* make the central ADL/AOM 1.5 specifications as clean as possible
* provide a series of updates to ADL 1.4, coming from the 1.5 specs,
that are carefully designed to be applied to 1.4 tools, to bring
them up to date
o e.g. things like how to post-fit the new identifiers, tuple
support, annotations, to DAL 1.4 archetype tools
* provide rules and tooling to deal with differences between archetype
paths, upon which querying is based
* provide a 1.4 => 1.5 upgrade tool to completely convert existing ADL
1.4 archetypes to the new format
The latest changes I propose (and have in fact implemented) are
primarily about dealing properly with the long-running problem(s) of
archetype node ids.
It's documented here on the wiki
<http://www.openehr.org/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=49053703>.
All comments and criticism welcome. If you think the proposal is broken
in some way, or could be done better, don't be afraid to say so. Please
comment on this list, or for substantive comments, the wiki page is
probably better. Let's try and get to a final proposal that works for
all ADL/AOM users - not just openEHR. I think that would be a real
achievement.
thanks
- thomas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20140101/f2500e62/attachment.html>
