On 14-05-14 23:51, pablo pazos wrote: > Just for fun: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pathological_(mathematics) > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pathological_%28mathematics%29>
Specially this section: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pathological_%28mathematics%29#Computer_science "awareness of pathological inputs is important as they can be exploited to mount a denial-of-service attack <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denial-of-service_attack> on a computer system" > > > Maybe the problem is trying to validate against the archetype at > first and then validate the IM. I think it should be IM 1st and AM > 2nd. But of course, I may overlooked some pathological case and > this might not work on 100% of the cases. > > > I don't know why you call it pathological, as if it has to do with > humans, something with freaks who want to crash systems, it can surely > be the case. > But more likely is a system which has a bug, and creates a faulty > dataset. A "pathological" dataset can be the result of a buggy system. > > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20140515/587551ce/attachment.html>
