On 13/11/2014 18:37, David Moner wrote: > I don't think so, but maybe we could use the release_candidate state, > instead the draft one that I mentioned.
well I think either could be correct, depending on the circumstances. E.g. the latest openEHR/FHIR joint Adverse reaction archetype might go in at 'release_candidate', but many other openEHR ones wouldn't. Even archetypes that are 'published' according to us could easily go in as drafts, since it may be that CIMI is the first environment where a really wide group of reviewers looks at it (and inevitably changes it). So.. I don't see any clear rules just yet ;-) - thomas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20141113/11faa05a/attachment.html>
