On 14/11/2014 08:42, Bj?rn N?ss wrote:
>
> I have been thinking about profiling. I am not sure if this fix the
> problem regarding complexity.
>
> This may be an governance thing. If we define a metric and british
> imperial profile we may define that in Norway every application MUST
> use the metric profile and other countries may select ?british
> imperial?. This could make it easier to set up validation on entries.
>
> Is this a usage you were thinking about?
>
exactly. It requires defining the profiles in the archetypes as per my
last post. I can see that it could work for units, not sure about other
things. If such profiles were defined, it would then be possible to make
a template tool remove elements you don't want when creating templates.
This would be done by the normal means e.g.
path/to/imperial/quantity occurrences matches {0}
but it would be done for you, and noone would have to go looking for them.
- thomas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20141114/d4d5b67a/attachment-0001.html>
