Sorry, this was supposed to be sent to the "clinical" list. Appologies! :)
Am 02.09.2014 15:05, schrieb Birger Haarbrandt: > Hi Folks, > > quick question (hope this has not been asked before. Is there a way to > quickly search in the archive?). As far I'm able to work with the CKM, > it seems it has never been discussed why events in the indirect > oximetry archetype have a limit of 1. Is there a reason for this > limitation while other vital parameters I know of may contain an > unlimited number of events? > > I know that I would be able to change the archetype for our use case > (automized vital parameter monitoring at ICUs) but I would like to get > some opinions on this first. Thanks! > > Best, > > -- > *Birger Haarbrandt, M.Sc.* > > Peter L. Reichertz Institut f?r Medizinische Informatik > Technische Universit?t Braunschweig und > Medizinische Hochschule Hannover > M?hlenpfordtstra?e 23 > D-38106 Braunschweig > > T +49 (0)531 391-2129 > F +49 (0)531 391-9502 > birger.haarbrandt at plri.de > http://www.plri.de > > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org -- *Birger Haarbrandt, M.Sc.* Peter L. Reichertz Institut f?r Medizinische Informatik Technische Universit?t Braunschweig und Medizinische Hochschule Hannover M?hlenpfordtstra?e 23 D-38106 Braunschweig T +49 (0)531 391-2129 F +49 (0)531 391-9502 birger.haarbrandt at plri.de http://www.plri.de -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20140902/07e38c5e/attachment.html>
