You're probably right. It is hard to find the acceptable level of strategic voting :)
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:54 PM, David Moner <[email protected]> wrote: > I would not do so. This is not an automatic process, this first phase is > just a way of filtering proposals. For sure the people in StackExchange > will evaluate each proposal in detail, and if they find that votes and > questions are clearly addressed or governed the proposal won't be accepted. > > 2015-06-11 17:41 GMT+02:00 Seref Arikan <[email protected] > >: > >> Thanks, can someone write a comment (shamelessly in capitals..) under >> the highest voted (16 the moment) question asking visitors to NOT to vote >> for questions with > 10 votes? My user can't do it for some reason. >> >> There are ~19 wasted points that could have been used on other questions >> a.t.m and people will just arrive and keep upvoting the top 5 ones. (This >> is a weird design; if > 10 votes do not help, why let users vote beyond 10 >> at that stage?) >> >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Cavero Barca, Carlos < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Done! 90 followers :) >>> >>> Regards. >>> Carlos. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: openEHR-technical [mailto: >>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Arild Faxvaag >>> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 3:46 PM >>> To: For openEHR technical discussions >>> Subject: Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close >>> >>> done signing up and upvoting. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> openEHR-technical mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> >>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org >>> This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended >>> solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this >>> e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. >>> As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group >>> liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender >>> endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not >>> warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any >>> damages resulting from any virus transmitted. >>> >>> Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener información >>> confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas >>> anteriormente y pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. >>> Si usted recibe este correo electrónico por error, gracias por informar >>> inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. >>> Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos >>> no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningún >>> compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificación escrita por ambas partes. >>> Aunque se esfuerza al máximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el >>> emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no será responsable de >>> cualesquiera daños que puedan resultar de una transmisión de virus. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> openEHR-technical mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> >>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openEHR-technical mailing list >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org >> > > > > -- > David Moner Cano > Grupo de Informática Biomédica - IBIME > Instituto ITACA > http://www.ibime.upv.es > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmoner > > Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (UPV) > Camino de Vera, s/n, Edificio G-8, Acceso B, 3ª planta > Valencia – 46022 (España) > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org >
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
