Hi Silje, Yes, that’s true, and we’ve been wanting to do new releases for a long time but it takes time, which we don’t have. There were some incompatibilities between the tools and also with old archetypes and templates. I think these have been fixed now, but I’m not sure. Somebody would need to test that the tools to make sure that they don’t introduce new problems. If we released them in an unstable state, this could cause much bigger problems.
Finding time to work on this is the problem. Regards, Peter On 7 Aug 2015, at 18:07, Bakke, Silje Ljosland <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I’m assuming there’s no reaction to this because everyone is still enjoying their well-earned holidays. ☺ But this is a serious issue, which leads to only people “in the know” being able to download updated tools and create and edit archetypes and templates which conform to the newest patterns. Precisely what we’d like to avoid, isn’t it? Regards, Silje From: openEHR-technical [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bakke, Silje Ljosland Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2015 10:45 AM To: For openEHR technical discussions Subject: RE: Archetype editor, CKM and v0 & v1 On a related note; the openehr.org<http://openehr.org> website still advertises Archetype Editor v2.2.905 beta from 2013, and Template Designer 2.6.1213.3. Especially now after the v1 -> v0 change, the newest builds should be linked from the web site. Kind regards, Silje Ljosland Bakke Information Architect, RN Coordinator, National Editorial Board for Archetypes National ICT Norway Tel. +47 40203298 Web: http://arketyper.no<http://arketyper.no/> / Twitter: @arketyper_no<https://twitter.com/arketyper_no> From: openEHR-technical [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thomas Beale Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 1:07 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: Archetype editor, CKM and v0 & v1 good point. Maybe a slightly more civilised version would be \.v[0-9]+(\..*)? that forces there to be one or more digits, and if there is anything else, it must start with a dot. Somewhat safer perhaps. - thomas On 22/07/2015 23:34, Peter Gummer wrote: Hi Ian, The + is redundant here, since it’s just saying that there has to be one or more digits after the ‘v’. But the next thing that it says is that you can have anything at all after those digits. So you might as well omit the +: \.v[0-9].* This says that there has to be a digit after the ‘v’, followed by anything at all. This amounts to the same, since any extra digits qualify as “anything at all”. Peter On 23 Jul 2015, at 01:55, Ian McNicoll <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Thanks Thomas, I will go with \.v[0-9]+.* which will give us a bit of flexibility and solve Dave's problem (I think!). unless anyone strongly objects, of course. Ian Dr Ian McNicoll mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 office +44 (0)1536 414994 skype: ianmcnicoll email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> twitter: @ianmcnicoll _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org -- [Ocean Informatics]<http://www.oceaninformatics.com/> Thomas Beale Chief Technology Officer +44 7792 403 613 Specification Program, openEHR<http://www.openehr.org/> Honorary Research Fellow, UCL<http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/> Chartered IT Professional Fellow, BCS<http://www.bcs.org.uk/> Health IT blog<http://wolandscat.net/category/health-informatics/> [View Thomas Beale's profile on LinkedIn]<http://uk.linkedin.com/in/thomasbeale> _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
