Hi Silje, I agree that ACTION.performer would be a useful addition (optional) to the RM. For now, I model performer as a participation. ACTION.other_participations inherits ENTRY.other_participations
http://www.openehr.org/releases/trunk/UML/#Diagrams___18_1_83e026d_1433173757197_893618_10673 The basic structure of participation is performer: PARTY_PROXY function : e.g "Perfomer" (text) mode: "face-to-face communication" (a fixed internal oepnEHR code) A snippet of openEHR JSON (this applies the participation at composition level but the internal structure of participation is the same "ctx/participation_name:0": "Dr. Marcus Johnson", "ctx/participation_function:0": "Performer", "ctx/participation_mode:0": "face-to-face communication", "ctx/participation_id:0": "1345678", "ctx/participation_name:0": "Dr. Marcus Johnson", "ctx/participation_function:0": "Performer", "ctx/participation_mode:0": "face-to-face communication", "ctx/participation_id:0": "1345678", "otherParticipations": [ { "function": { "value": "Oncologist" }, "mode": { "definingCode": { "codeString": "216", "terminologyId": { "value": "openehr" } }, "value": "face-to-face communication" }, "performer": { "externalRef": { "id": { "scheme": "2.16.840.1.113883.2.1.4.3", "value": "1345678" }, "namespace": "NHS-UK", "type": "ANY" }, "identifiers": [], "name": "Dr. Marcus Johnson" }, "time": null }, Dr Ian McNicoll mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 office +44 (0)1536 414994 skype: ianmcnicoll email: [email protected] twitter: @ianmcnicoll Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation [email protected] Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd. Director, HANDIHealth CIC Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL On 27 August 2015 at 10:00, Bakke, Silje Ljosland < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > > > According to Norwegian law, the performer or main performer of a procedure > has to be explicitly recorded. The main performer is not necessarily the > same person who records the action, so the COMPOSITION.composer RM object > may not be used for this. We can’t seem to find any complete description of > the ACTION.participations RM object, but if it’s possible to specify the > role of the participant there, this may possibly be used. Or will we have > to explicitly model this in the ACTION.procedure archetype? > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > Kind regards, > *Silje Ljosland Bakke* > > > > Information Architect, RN > > Coordinator, National Editorial Board for Archetypes > National ICT Norway > > Tel. +47 40203298 > > Web: http://arketyper.no / Twitter: @arketyper_no > <https://twitter.com/arketyper_no> > > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org >
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
