Hi Silje,
I would not expect any problems.
- thomas
On 28/08/2015 23:05, Bakke, Silje Ljosland wrote:
Hi everyone,
We’ve bumped into an issue related to versioning of archetypes and
implementing non-published versions:
Several implementation projects are using archetypes from the
http://arketyper.no CKM, many of which are still drafts or under
review since the CKM switch to v0 for unpublished archetypes was done
only recently, and the publicly available tools all use v1 by default,
lots of functionality has already been made using unpublished v1
versions of archetypes, and will be deployed this autumn. Of course,
when reviewed, these archetypes may go through drastic changes, and
this will be a problem once other projects at a later time try to use
archetypes which by then may have been published as v1.
One of our proposed solutions is to skip v1 for these archetypes and
go straight to v2 when publishing them. Is this practically possible,
and will it have any adverse consequences?
Kind regards,
*Silje Ljosland Bakke*
**
Information Architect, RN
Coordinator, National Editorial Board for Archetypes
National ICT Norway
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
