On 04-09-15 13:31, Gunnar Klein wrote:
I mean the submission of certain openEHR specs to ISO can be made with the present formal status of the Foundation being tied to UCL. To further gain acceptance also by governmental bodies around the globe where people may like openEHR but may hesitate to invest in such an informal body success, I think that a true international organisation without any ties to a specific university may be of some (not big but some) benefit. Also avoid criticisms of the Freriks type.
I understand, sounds reasonable. Thanks for the explanation Bert _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
