Nice job, Thomas.

Glad to see other people picked up that the project's original use of the
term 'disruptive innovation' was too broad.

"Disruptive innovation, a term of art coined by Clayton Christensen,
describes a process by which a product or service takes root *initially in
simple applications* at the bottom of a market and then relentlessly moves
up market, eventually displacing established competitors. - See more at:
http://www.claytonchristensen.com/key-concepts/#sthash.Bky22rii.dpuf";

Ian


Dr Ian McNicoll
mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
office +44 (0)1536 414994
skype: ianmcnicoll
email: [email protected]
twitter: @ianmcnicoll

Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation [email protected]
Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd.
Director, HANDIHealth CIC
Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL

On 8 April 2016 at 14:36, Thomas Beale <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> In November 2015, there was an EC RFI on their draft document on
> 'disruptive innovation'
> <http://ec.europa.eu/health/expert_panel/consultations/disruptive_innovation_en.htm>
> put out, to which openEHR put together a response.
>
> The new document
> <http://ec.europa.eu/health/expert_panel/opinions/docs/012_disruptive_innovation_en.pdf>
> and also the responses list
> <http://ec.europa.eu/health/expert_panel/consultations/docs/2016_results_disruptive_innovation_en.pdf>
> are now published. The openEHR responses are under my name (near the top),
> because the EC portal only handles person names (you'll see the same thing
> for all the other responses). Some of our recommendations were used in a
> very light way. Some of the other responses are interesting to read.
>
> I don't know how much importance this kind of document has to us 'working
> on the ground', but some may find it interesting. In theory it would be
> used as a guide for determining where to invest EU e-health funds, but its
> level of abstraction and generality in most places, and then arbitrary
> selection of specifics make me think that it won't change much. Who knows -
> people who are closer to EC workings may care to comment.
>
> - thomas
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
>
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org

Reply via email to