Hi Thomas,
I think it would be very useful to have a centralized list of validity rules 
with a reference to the source (specs, CKM, other specific tool, good practice, 
local rule, etc.).
As a developer, that would help me to use those rules in software.
And as a clinical modeler I can check those rules while designing an archetype 
or a template (manually or using a tool).
The spec rules should be on specs (doh!) but I think we might need something 
more dynamic that we can use to add / maintain rules from all the current 
sources, like a github repo for rules (can be a page on the openEHR wiki o the 
wiki on a github repo).

-- 
Kind regards,
Eng. Pablo Pazos GutiƩrrez
http://cabolabs.com

Subject: Re: ADL validity rules on CKM
To: [email protected]
From: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 12:03:13 +0100


  
    
  
  
    Hi Pablo,

    only a few rules were specified in ADL/AOM 1.4 - you can see them
      in the ADL1.4 spec - I think you will find the newer
        HTML version easier to use. They were not collected in an
      easy to read list, but I think we could do this easily enough by
      constructing an index of the relevant paragraph type, and
      inserting that into the document. I'll see what is possible in
      Asciidoctor.

    

    In ADL2, it is the AOM2
        spec that provides the validity rule definitions.

    

    I'm not sure what the total set Sebastian uses is, but I suspect
      it includes some of the AOM2 rules, i.e. those that would have the
      same meaning for ADL1.4 archetypes.

    We should improve how these rules are represented in the specs
      potentially, and a minor update to the ADL1.4 spec could be used
      to update the effective rule set for ADL 1.4

    - thomas

    

    

    On 14/06/2016 07:54, pablo pazos wrote:

    
    
      
      Thanks for the input Sebastian,
        

        
        
          Are all of those internal to the CKM?
          Is there any plan to document them in some place to have
            all the rules together?
          

          
          Maybe there are a lot of internal rules that we don't
            know of and would be useful to have them documented. (Maybe
            a task for the clinical models program?)
          

          
        
      
    
    

  


_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org   
                                  
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org

Reply via email to