I uploaded my ontologies to a Git repository, you can download here https://bitbucket.org/uhospital/openehr-rm.
Yes, my approach to handle generics was to create a specialized version for every possible T type. For example, to create a DV_INTERVAL locked to DV_QUANTITY I would subclass DV_INTERVAL adding a restriction so lower and upper properties only accepts DV_QUANTITY values. My other problem was with lists. The OWL language doesn't have a construction for data containers, only RDF do (through rdf:list). I tried to use a linked list like described here <http://protege.stanford.edu/conference/2006/submissions/abstracts/7.1_Drummond_listsInProtegeOWL.pdf> but I would not be able to create inferences. Currently, lists are represented just with multiples values for a single property. 2016-07-13 4:03 GMT-03:00 Seref Arikan <serefari...@kurumsalteknoloji.com>: > Hi Matheus, > > I'd be interested to hear about your problems. I'd also be curious to > learn how you handled generics/parameterized types. Unless one defines a > meta layer in owl with semantics for generics, I guess the only option is > to materialize every possible type parameter T to its own type. > > All the best > Seref > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Matheus Wichman < > matheus.wich...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Seref, >> >> The ontologies available on the link you posted were developed using an >> old specification of RM. >> >> I converted the current RM to OWL, like Isabel did. However I had some >> problems to represent list structures. >> >> 2016-07-12 13:02 GMT-03:00 Seref Arikan < >> serefari...@kurumsalteknoloji.com>: >> >>> Greetings, >>> >>> I was wondering if there is any projects out there that provide an OWL >>> version of the RM. >>> >>> I found this page: http://trajano.us.es/~isabel/EHR/ where an OWL >>> version is kindly provided, though I'll need to get in touch with the >>> author to clarify the terms and conditions of use. >>> >>> There are papers out there that use an OWL representation of archetypes >>> etc but I could not find any RM representation other than the link above. >>> Any pointers would be appreciated. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Seref >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> openEHR-technical mailing list >>> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org >>> >>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Atenciosamente, >> >> Matheus Wichman >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openEHR-technical mailing list >> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org >> >> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org > -- Atenciosamente, Matheus Wichman
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
