Hi all,

Regarding the genericity of the openEHR IM, from the implementation point of 
view we have at least 3 models:


+ the implementation information model

+ the persistence information model

+ and the reference / canonic information model (the openEHR IM)


Others might have more than these 3 models on their openEHR implementations.


I think some simplifications can still be done to the openEHR IM without losing 
semantics, like removing ITEM_STRUCTURE and using just CLUSTER/ELEMENT (we have 
a discussion about this on the wiki started some years ago).


IMO we should not try to make the reference model simpler just in sake of 
simplifying the implementation, since the other 2 models are for that. In my 
systems I have different implementation models that are over simplified openEHR 
IM implementations, and also very specific / optimized / generic persistence 
information models compatible with the openEHR IM. And I think the 
implementation / persistence models are the ones we can simplify and adjust to 
our needs, but not the reference model, since it's role is that: be the 
reference for all implementations.



--
Kind regards,
Eng. Pablo Pazos Guti??rrez
http://cabolabs.com<http://cabolabs.com/es/home><http://twitter.com/ppazos>
________________________________
From: openEHR-technical <[email protected]> on behalf 
of Mikael Nyström <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 4:15:53 AM
To: For openEHR technical discussions
Subject: SV: SV: More generic reference model

Hi,

A related activity that might be useful to know is the "RFP for LOINC - SNOMED 
CT Cooperation Project". 
http://www.ihtsdo.org/news-articles/rfp-for-loinc--snomed-ct-cooperation-project
 .

                             Regards
                             Mikael

Från: openEHR-technical [mailto:[email protected]] 
För Bert Verhees
Skickat: den 9 september 2016 08:42
Till: [email protected]
Ämne: Re: SV: More generic reference model

Op 9-9-2016 om 8:37 schreef Bjørn Næss:
But in addition to that we need to map terms from different other terminologies 
like SNOMED-CT, LOINC and also Disease Ontologies.

There is a mapping effort by IHTSDO en Regenstrief, they started that a few 
years ago, and it will be finished, next year, I think.

http://www.ihtsdo.org/about-ihtsdo/partnerships/loinc
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org

Reply via email to