Op 11-9-2016 om 20:01 schreef Thomas Beale:
On 11/09/2016 15:48, pablo pazos wrote:
Hi Bert,
I was thinking about integrating SCT with path-based queries (I'm not
in AQL yet), but maintaining the complexity of the SCT relationships
and expressions on the terminology service (TS) side, so on queries
there are just simple codes (specific concept ids, subsets or
expressions identified just by one code). Then when evaluating a
query, with the TS we can get all the terms and concept ids that
match all the is_a relationships or subsets of expressions. I talked
with several TS providers and hopefully we can build an integration
next year to create and evaluate queries with SCT.
What I'm saying is that I prefer to delegate the complexity of SCT to
the TS and create simpler queries in AQL or path-based queries, but
your idea is interesting. One problem though is that query creators
need to be experts in SCT.
this is also a real issue - and one that has no clear answer that I
know of...
About the experts,
I remember when my kids were 4 years old (twins) in the swimmingpool (it
must have been 2003 or so), I had printed out the OpenEHR documents,
must have been a few hundreds pages hard the grasp text, reading under
the sunny sky with sunglasses, a lot of noise of yelling kids around me.
I never regretted doing that. It paid my bills for 10 years or so.
I imagine someone studying SCT query techniques in a similar situation
now, and having all the technical advantages, like a tablet and Wifi in
the swimmingpool. One will never regret studying SCT.
- thomas
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
