Hi! Great to hear about your project! Please tell us a bit more if you have time, what are the pilot use-cases? (I am curious since we are planning some tests in Sweden too...)
It is true that adl 1.4 is currently more used, but for new projects it is good to track the ADL 2 development. There are tools to automatically convert archetypes between 1.4 and 2.0, so it is possible to set up workflows starting from the either the 1.4 or 2.0 end. The ADL 2 tools are moving forward, so if your modellers will want to use web-based tools, then plan for 2.0 fairly soon. I hope you have seen : - https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/display/dev/Online+archetype+and+template+tools and - https://twitter.com/marandlab/status/826832144672686081 Best regards, Erik Sundvall Ph.D. Medical Informatics. Information Architect. Tel: +46-72-524 54 55 (or 010-1036252 in Sweden) Region Östergötland: [email protected] (previously lio.se) http://www.regionostergotland.se/cmit/ Linköping University: [email protected], http://www.imt.liu.se/~erisu/ On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Pieter Bos <[email protected]> wrote: > The editing tools for adl 2 are still limited. However the template > editing by hand is easier in adl 2 than the earlier template xml formats > because it's the same adl with a few extra language constructs for > templates. > > And you can convert the ckm to adl 2 quite easily. > > Pieter Bos > > > Op 12 feb. 2017 om 12:04 heeft Diego Bosc? <[email protected]<mailto:yamp > [email protected]>> het volgende geschreven: > > Hello Dileep, > > If you stick with ADL 1.4 then you could use LinkEHR Studio ( > http://linkehr.com) to create templates from other RM such as demographic > model. The same tool can be used to import OET and export OPT for any given > RM. > > Regards > > El 12/2/2017 9:44, "Dileep V S" <[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> escribi?: > Hi, > > We are exploring OpenEHR as part of a public health management pilot > project in India and have some questions that I am unable to find proper > answers. > > After studying the available libraries, tools and opensource server > implementations, ADL 1.4 seems to be more widely supported than the newer > ADL 2.0. The shared archetype repository (CKM) still contains only 1.4 > version archetypes. In light of this, I am assuming that for anybody > planning to adopt OpenEHR, it will be advisable to stick to ADL1.4 for now. > > Further I have learned the following wrt. ADL 1.4 standards > > File formats for 1.4 version > > * Archetypes - ADL 1.4 > * Templates - OET > * Operational template - OPT 1.4 > > Modelling tools - Archetype editor, template designer > > I am stuck with trying to answer the following questions. It would be > great if somebody can help. > > 1. Can we hand create templates that are not supported by the template > designer? For example demographics? > 2. If yes how do we convert the hand coded OETs to OPTs? > 3. Where do we get more details on OET file syntax? > > Thanks > > Dileep > HealtheLife Ventures LLP > bamgalore > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:openEHR- > [email protected]> > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr- > technical_lists.openehr.org > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:openEHR- > [email protected]> > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr- > technical_lists.openehr.org > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr- > technical_lists.openehr.org >
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
