There are several kinds of context archetypes/templates and their meta-data are used for: - de novo data - re-used data - step in the clinical treatment model (observation, assessment/inference, planning, ordering, execution) - kind of interface it is designed for (data presentation on a screen, data capture, database store/retrieve, CDSS, …
Each Template needs to capture all this and is a Composition. All these contexts are characteristics of a Composition in the end. Questionnaires are in essence a tool that classifies information. And sometimes it transforms a set of responses into an aggregated value/code The questionnaire can be treated as any classification, meaning we need to de fine inclusion and exclusion criteria, and possible results per question can be a quantitative result (number, PQ, code), or a semi-quantitative result (high, low), or a qualitative result (present/ not present). Semi-Qualitative results need, inclusion/exclusion criteria and a definition of what the norm/population is is about (females, children, etc.) Gerard Freriks +31 620347088 gf...@luna.nl > On 31 May 2017, at 06:54, Pablo Pazos <pablo.pa...@cabolabs.com> wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > Thinking about the hierarchy, at which level will be a Report be? Below > compo? Below entry? Structure? Representation? > > OT: many asked me this and didn't had a good answer. Do we have a pattern to > model questionnaires? Some require to define questions, and the answer type > in most cases is boolean, or coded text (multiple choice), and answers might > be 0..* (more than one answer for the same question is valid). > > Cheers, > Pablo. >
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
