On 26-01-18 08:53, Sebastian Garde wrote:
This is where I think that not only it is stated that openEHR uses
UCUM (and not some part or “inspiration” of it), but also implies that
the case sensitive version of it is used (which in my view is
important to know at least for some of the units). I still think it
would be good to explicitly say that the case-sensitive version is used?
Just for the record, my point I wanted to make was that OpenEhr does not
define use of the facilities of UCUM (like properties and conversions),
as we see now in the discussion, which I think is very useful and making
use of UCUM facilities possible.
Quoting myself from a reply this morning:
> If it would, not only use the stringified units of UCUM, but also
would incorporate UCUM-defined functionality, it would also have, for
example, conversion routines from UCUM, which are usable for software
defined in the UCUM essence-file."
Bert
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
