On 12-12-18 14:49, Diego Boscá wrote:
These are modifications on the parser, which parses more things than
your standard parser. In fact, the editor supports legal things in ADL
that other parsers don't (e.g. explicit node identifiers or
existence). The generated ADL is completely fine ADL. There are tools
that don't comply with this general ADL, and we provided an export
version of archetypes that produces a modified version of the ADL
syntax that other older and not maintained tools can parse.
If you want to call this subset "official archetypes" be my guest.
The word "official" was used by you, I used it (in quotes) to indicate
that we refer to the same.
But it may get confusing, also because in the past there were
discussions about LinkEhr and the Ocean archetype-editor which had
different interpretations of the prevailing definitions. They did not
always eat each others archetypes.
I think at this point it is important to state in a simple way, then
there will be no reason for doubt about intentions:
Does the LinkEhr editor produce archetypes which are always intended to
be completely conforming the official ADL/AOM and RM definitions?
openEHR-technical mailing list