Hello,
In what extends does the specification language for defining archetypes
and the language for defining templates differ ?
Both take existing data models (RM types and archetypes) and constrain
them as needed.
It is often said, that archetypes are used to recombine RM types and
templates are used to recombine archetypes. But the slot mechanism
within the archetype definition does as well allow archetypes
recombination within archetypes. And the constraining that is done
within templates could as well be done using the constraining mechanisms
of archetype design.
Why are two specification languages needed ? And if one has elements
that the other is missing, why can't those elements simply be included
in the other, to reduce the amount of specification languages ?
Greetings
Georg
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Dipl.-Inf. Georg Fette Raum: B001
Universität Würzburg Tel.: +49-(0)931-31-85516
Am Hubland Fax.: +49-(0)931-31-86732
97074 Würzburg mail: georg.fe...@uni-wuerzburg.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
