+1 to more descriptive names
-dain
On Jul 22, 2006, at 6:52 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
+1 (the more descriptive it is the better).
Jacek
On 7/20/06, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After spending a good year+ dealing with issues involving CorbaBean,
CSSBean, and TSSBean I've come to the realization that part of the
problem with understanding how these work is the names are
misleading...particularly CSSBean and TSSBean.
TSSBean calls itself the "CORBA Target Security Service". While some
aspects of its configuration involve defining transport level
security,
this bean is really a proxy that manages a POA instance for
exposing an
EJB container as a CORBA object. The TSSBean name somehow
obscures the
fact that there is a TSSBean instance for every exported EJB.
CorbaObjectProxy or EjbPoaProxy might be better names.
CSSBean calls itself the "CORBA Client Security Server". Similar
problem with TSSBean. Security is only one aspect of this
bean....and
it's not really a "Server". CorbaClientObject might make it a little
clearer what's being configured.
CorbaBean is not too bad, but it seems to imply a global CORBA
configuration rather than configuring a single ORB instance.
CorbaServerOrb would capture the essential server-side ORB nature
of this.
Rick
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.net.pl
