Hey...back to the early part of this thread. Why don't we want to continue to generate the object graph? I am asking that because if JAXB changes their code generation, etc, then we will need to regenerate. Why would we want to store the object graph?
David Blevins wrote: > > On Aug 11, 2006, at 11:43 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: > >> Well...this time of year I prefer to use a Salmon...I'll let you know ;-) > > Nice choice. > > Get your Salmon ready, I had to disable the main PersistenceDeployer > tests as OpenJPA's class enhancing tool tries to enhance everything in > the persistence.xml file even if the unit belongs to another provider, > so I commented out the FakePersistenceProvider unit as a workaround. > > I'll raise the issue with them tomorrow and see if we can't get those > test back. We are using the PersistenceDeployer for the OpenJPA tests, > obviously, so we're in good shape. > > -David > >> David Blevins wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 11, 2006, at 8:46 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: >>> >>>> Hehe...I was going there...thus the reason I asked JAXB vs >>>> JAXB2...but I >>>> didn't follow up ;-) Glad the solution bubbled itself up ;-) >>>> >>> >>> I'm hacking your persistence deployer code apart. Feel free to slap me >>> with a trout if you see something you don't like. Mostly just >>> abstracting and expanding. >>> >>> -David >>> >>> >>>> Jeff >>>> >>>> David Blevins wrote: >>>>> On Jul 17, 2006, at 8:54 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> JAXB or JAXB2? >>>>>> >>>>>> David Blevins wrote: >>>>>>> I have the start of support for the EJB3 ejb-jar.xml worked in using >>>>>>> JAXB. It's working great and the itests run, the only trick is it >>>>>>> *only* supports ejb3 descriptors, i.e. you *must* have this at >>>>>>> the top >>>>>>> of your ejb-jar.xml >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <ejb-jar xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee" ...> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Using the previous namespace or using no namespace at all no longer >>>>>>> works. This might be easy to solve, but I'm quite a JAXB novice. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The namespace info comes from an annotation in a package-info.java >>>>>>> class. Don't know if there is some other way to specify it or >>>>>>> override >>>>>>> the annotation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any know how we might do this? >>>>> >>>>> Mr. Genender you totally read this email completely neglected to >>>>> mention >>>>> you found a solution to this problem in the persistence code you >>>>> wrote! :) >>>>> >>>>> I just happened across this wile reworking it to not generate each >>>>> time: >>>>> >>>>> <snip> >>>>> // Create a filter to intercept events >>>>> PersistenceFilter xmlFilter = new >>>>> PersistenceFilter(xmlReader); >>>>> >>>>> // Be sure the filter has the JAXB content handler set (or >>>>> it wont >>>>> // work) >>>>> xmlFilter.setContentHandler(uh); >>>>> SAXSource source = new SAXSource(xmlFilter, new >>>>> InputSource(persistenceDescriptor)); >>>>> [...] >>>>> // Inject the proper namespace >>>>> class PersistenceFilter extends XMLFilterImpl { >>>>> >>>>> public PersistenceFilter(XMLReader arg0) { >>>>> super(arg0); >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> @Override >>>>> public void startElement(String arg0, String arg1, String >>>>> arg2, >>>>> Attributes arg3) throws SAXException { >>>>> >>>>> super.startElement("http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence", >>>>> arg1, arg2, arg3); >>>>> } >>>>> } >>>>> </snip> >>>>> >>>>> This is totally going to work for our ejb-jar.xml parsing too. >>>>> >>>>> I'm a happy man. >>>>> >>>>> -David >>>> >>
