On Sep 29, 2006, at 3:01 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Since I need to redo the packaging for the Yoko ORB support I've been working on, this is a good time to ask the question. In the process of creating the Yoko support, I copied what was done with the sunorb and created a subpackage of org.openejb.corba to contain the yoko adapters. This gave the tree packages of org.openejb.corba.yoko and org.openejb.corba.sunorb.
I like this. FYI, though s/org.openejb/org.apache.openejb/
Then, when I split these two out into separate modules so they were built as separate units, I maintained those package names. Is it legitimate to still use the org.openejb.corba parent package (which is "owned" by the openejb-core module), or should I create a new package structure for this? I was originally thinking org.apache.openejb.orb.yoko and org.apache.openejb.orb.sunorb, but having two different modules share the same packaging is making me a little uneasy. Perhaps org.apache.openejb.yoko.orb and org.apache.openejb.sun.orb would be better choices. Anybody have any preferences, or should I just keep what I was using originally?
Couple questions. Is there any shared code between o.a.openejb.corba.yoko and o.a.openejb.corba.sunorb that would/could go into o.a.openejb.corba? Is it possible to split o.a.openejb.corba out into two (maybe three) modules?
modules/openejb-corba (if there's shared code) modules/openejb-yoko modules/openejb-sunorb Thoughts? -David
