Hi Feilippo... Well it is spread all over chapter#16, this was not specified for the task I mentioned in my last reply, it is used in the specs as the default JNDI reference name constructed for the referenced resources by an EJB, so I suggested to use the same approach.
On 12/7/06, Filippo Diotalevi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we can use the approach specified in the specs of EJB3.0 "Core > Contracts and Requirements", that we use the fully qualified name of the EJB > followed by the name of the interface(s) it supports. For example if we have > an EJB com.oejb3.examples.ExampleBean, and this EJB supports two biz > interfaces, so we can have two JNDI names as follows for each biz interface, > *java:comp/env/com.oejb3.examples.ExampleBean/BizIntfcOne* > and *java:comp/env/com.oejb3.examples.ExampleBean/BizIntfcTwo*. Thoughts ??? Hi Mohammad, where did you find this fact mentioned in the specification? -- Filippo
-- Thanks - Mohammad Nour
