On Dec 14, 2006, at 9:38 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Dec 14, 2006, at 11:37 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Dec 14, 2006, at 8:26 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I wonder if this is a side effect of mvn 2 packaging?
Yes.
OK. So, I think most of my concerns come down to how mvn handles
release packaging. OpenEJB 2.2 is really a maven release. And the
source jars created by maven aren't really meant to be buildable
(it's really for ide/debugging purposes).
Personally, I'd feel better with a source distribution which is
created by svn export and tar/zip/jar'ing up the result. That's
just my opinion...
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/
openejb-2.2-incubating-src.tar.gz
openejb-2.2-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc
openejb-2.2-incubating-src.tar.gz.md5
openejb-2.2-incubating-src.tar.gz.sha
openejb-2.2-incubating-src.zip
openejb-2.2-incubating-src.zip.asc
openejb-2.2-incubating-src.zip.md5
openejb-2.2-incubating-src.zip.sha
On Dec 14, 2006, at 7:25 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Has anyone verified the digital signatures of every archive?
Done. All is good.
-David
