On Jan 5, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jan 3, 2007, at 9:40 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 3, 2007, at 8:54 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I like this. It would make *deep* embedding much easier if there
where a single object to start with that encapsulated the details
of the Assembler and ContainerSystem.
Yea, if you read all of this thread where I propose the properties
stuff[1] to Vincent who was doing a Cactus integration, the
ultimate feeling from him was that he would prefer a more Jetty-
like approach where he could simply "build" things himself.
I guess I would describe this assembler as more of a "push"
approach rather than a "pull" approach that we have now in the
classic assembler. Push == you construct and call us, Pull ==
we'll construct and call you. I.e. with a Pull you have to
implement an interface that we consume to pull our data out. Not
ideal for everyone.
I personally prefer the push approach with the OpenEJB project
providing a default assembler.
Starting to like that too. I like the addContainer, addEjbJar, type
methods etc. What do you like about it? (curious)
-David
