On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 05:53:38PM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > I still strongly believe we need something in core which pulls together > all our pieces into a UI where you can test key elements of what we > build. If we don't have sato how do we actually test the core or demo > it? > > I think we shouldn't rush into things here. We should ramp up our > wayland testing and make the wayland images more useful/comprehensive > and then look at moving more of our tests from sato to the wayland > images. > > So in summary, yes, I think we do retarget our testing over time and > strengthen when were testing under wayland. I probably don't see that > needing to happen quite as quickly as you do though!
Agreed, it might be nicer to have x11 separated in some meta-x11 layer and meta-sato in another layer as well, but as long as there is no clear replacement and x11 in oe-core doesn't cause too much work I think that dropping x11 from DISTRO_FEATURES is working quite nicely for people who don't care about x11 at all already. Maybe it would make sense to remove x11 from default DISTRO_FEATURES and/or include opengl+wayland instead? Cheers,
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-architecture mailing list Openembedded-architecture@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-architecture
