On Wed 2020-07-15 @ 03:05:38 AM, Rich Persaud wrote: > On Jul 15, 2020, at 01:31, Trevor Woerner <[email protected]> wrote: > > We discussed this briefly at the most recent YP Technical Team/Engineering > > Sync Meeting. Many good points were raised. I'd like to start a discussion > > on > > this topic via email in order to enumerate and keep track of these efforts. > > Is there a YP mailing list where the minutes of the YP meeting were posted?
I post them on the yocto mailing list in plain text with formatting, or you can see them all collected here in google docs: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ly8nyhO14kDNnFcW2QskANXW3ZT7QwKC5wWVDg9dDH4/edit I haven't done today's posting yet. They usually have a title something along the lines of: Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for <date> > > 1. As a project we need to decide whether or not to undertake this work. Not > > all projects have decided to make any changes. The discussions we had at the > > last meeting made it feel as though it was a forgone conclusion by those who > > spoke up that we would take on this work. Is that the consensus? Silence > > represents agreement? > > Also discussed at the June 24th, 2020 OpenEmbedded Happy Hour This email is my attempt to get everyone together on this topic since, for now, email is one of this project's main channels for communication. Yesterday's call was the first time I had heard anyone bring it up (except for Richard's email about some upstream projects no longer having a master branch). > where many > points were raised without foregone conclusions. I'm merely pointing out the conversation went straight into getting a feeling for what was involved. > > 6. Terminology. The Linux kernel project has put out some recommendations: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=49decddd39e5f6132ccd7d9fdc3d7c470b0061bb > > From the Linux coding style diff, "avoid introducing new usage", refers to > new names, rather than changing existing systems with consequential impact on > distributed supply chains for live systems. > > > To start the discussion, can we please get a consensus on item #1? > > It would be helpful to define the work being proposed ("whether or not to > undertake this work"), before seeking new funding for the proposed work, from > YP or OE stakeholders. Fair enough. Where did you read anything about looking for funding?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#1121): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1121 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/75515261/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
