On Tue, 2021-06-15 at 09:32 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello Richard, > > Em ter., 15 de jun. de 2021 às 07:29, Richard Purdie > <[email protected]> escreveu: > > I wondered about making := clear existing overrides/appends/prepends/removes > > but then I wondered if we should have a new assignment operator which > > would do that (and also not force the value to be expanded). I mentioned > > this > > on irc and there were a few suggestions: > > Having it resetting it might fix this use case but what if the _collie > use case is a valid one? how the BSP vendor could override it?
Think about this in the context of what the initramfs recipe is trying to do. It doesn't care about IMAGE_FSTYPES, it cares about INITRAMFS_FSTYPES only. If the BSP wants to change anything they'd be changing INITRAMFS_FSTYPES for the initramfs recipe. Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#1233): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1233 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/83552628/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
