I have not been working with the eSDK so far.

We are heavy users of the standard SDK, and use it daily in the team for 
application development.
We use it with QtCreator and CMake including remote debugging. During setup, we 
obtain a single time information from the environment to create the kit within 
QtCreator.
Later, when using the kit, the environment is no longer used. This has the 
advantage that you can use multiple SDKs for different devices and versions at 
the same time in QtCreator.

Please don't eliminate the standard SDK with its separate installer and 
independence to BitBake etc.
>From the user perspective of an application developer it is perfect.

Best regards,
Matthias
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#1602): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1602
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/90990557/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to