Le sam. 25 févr. 2023 à 11:24, Richard Purdie <
[email protected]> a écrit :
> Hi All,
>
Hi,
> [...]
> As I see it there are a few options:
>
> a) Do nothing and continue with the above
> b) Generate an empty PN
> c) Delete PN from PACKAGES
>
d) Move the contents of PN-dev to PN
> e) Something else
>
> I think I'm in favour of c), removing PN from PACKAGES and not even
> pretending it exists. We could add an RPROVIDES:${PN}-dev += "${PN} so
> that assumptions about naming work, not sure about that.
> [...]
>
Another "data point" for this discussion : ${PN}-ptest DEPENDS on ${PN}
See this discussion for example :
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/topic/patch_3_3_zvariant_add/98436061
For "Delete PN from PACKAGES" (option c), we would need to change how ptest
depends on the tested package (or use the RPROVIDES)
Regards,
--
Yoann Congal
Smile ECS - Tech expert
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#1709):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/1709
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/97224039/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
