On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 at 21:03, Weber (US), Matthew L via
lists.openembedded.org
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Does my understanding as follows sound correct?  Yocto doesn't provide a 
> binary distro, so we first build with Yocto from source, e.g., a small 
> generic x86 kernel and then setup a feed of kernel module pkgs and pkg world. 
>  Can I assume a user's only option to build a system, would be to boot a 
> system to use the feed "online" to make a rootfs have everything they need? 
> Or are there more options for composing offline so the end users grabs a 
> kernel and a script that pulls a rootfs together offline from 
> emulation/hw/yocto env?(debootstrap like)

Making a complete product image offline with bitbake, from recipes in
layers, is actually the primary way Yocto works. Embedded world isn't
really using package feeds and package managers, rather you run
bitbake to make an image that contains a complete product, and you
flash it to a device. There are all sorts of software update
mechanisms, but by an large they all operate with complete images as
well, often in a A/B partition scheme.

The reason 'classical' desktop distributions have to start with a
minimal bootstrap, and do the rest on the system itself is that they
do not have offline cross-compile support based on sysroot
directories. Yocto does.

Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#2218): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/2218
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/117514584/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

  • [Openembedded-architectur... Weber (US), Matthew L via lists.openembedded.org
    • Re: [Openembedded-ar... Alexander Kanavin via lists.openembedded.org

Reply via email to